The execution layer between your marketing strategy and your marketing stack.
Tell it the business outcome you want. GENESIS47 reads live across Salesforce, Marketo, your ad accounts and 53 more connected platforms, shows you the evidence, proposes the action — and executes the one you approve.
Why was pipeline down last week?
Paid search, Denver
−31%
Salesforce · Tableau · pulled 12m ago
The product
One screen for the whole department.
What moved, what it did overnight, and what needs your decision. Every figure says which system it came from and when it was pulled.
Qualified this week
0
Zoho CRM · 12m ago
Open quotes
0
Zoho CRM · 12m ago
Cost per qualified lead
$0
Reports · 1h ago
By branch
| Branch | Qualified | Won | Spend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denver | 9 | 4 | $1,240 |
| Salt Lake | 6 | 3 | $980 |
| Boise | 5 | 2 | $760 |
| Spokane | 3 | 1 | $540 |
Needs your call
2- Raise the Meta budget 20% — three weeks above target
- Approve the September pricing copy
What it did this week
- Paused two ad sets under targetTue
- Rewrote 14 product descriptionsTue
- Sent the winback flow to 806 accountsWed
Works with the 56 platforms your teams already run
Platforms reachable over MCP: HubSpot, GoHighLevel, Salesforce, Zoho CRM, Attio, Pipedrive, Apollo.io, Clay, Close, Follow Up Boss, Dynamics 365, Google Ads, Meta Ads, TikTok Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Microsoft Ads, Reddit Ads, X Ads, Snap Ads, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, MailerLite, ActiveCampaign, Brevo, Customer.io, Instagram, LinkedIn, YouTube, TikTok, X, Facebook, Pinterest, Threads, Reddit, Bluesky, Canva, OpusClip, Google Analytics, Search Console, Ahrefs, Semrush, Similarweb, Mixpanel, Amplitude, PostHog, Supermetrics, Windsor.ai, GEOly, Shopify, Stripe, AWS, GitHub, Vercel, Cloudflare, Slack, Notion.
Spend → revenue
Four days to find out why pipeline dropped. Or one question.
The chain from a dollar of spend to a dollar of revenue crosses five systems and four teams, and no one of them can see the whole of it. This is what it looks like when something does — and can move the money as well as name the problem.
One question, five systems
- Spend01
Google, Meta, LinkedIn
- Lead02
Marketo
- Qualified03
Salesforce
- Opportunity04
Salesforce
- Revenue05
Salesforce, Tableau
Nobody is missing this data. It is sitting in five places, owned by four teams, reconciled by hand on a Monday. By the time the chain is assembled the week it describes is over.
Asked at 09:12 — why did Denver pipeline drop?
Answered 09:12
Denver paid search CPA is up 34% against the trailing four weeks.
Google Ads · pulled 09:12
Qualified lead rate on that spend fell 21% over the same window.
Salesforce · pulled 09:12
The break starts Wednesday. Nothing changed in the campaigns that day.
Google Ads, Marketo · pulled 09:12
Competitor terms account for 71% of the deterioration.
Google Ads · search terms, 28d
Proposed
Move $42,000 off the competitor terms and into the four campaigns still converting.
Reversible for 30 days. Spend authority on this account is $50,000, so this one is inside the line you drew — and it is still going to ask.
An illustration, with figures composed rather than taken from a customer. The systems, the stages and the shape of the readout are exactly what runs.
Why not your suite
Your suite's AI knows your suite.
Every vendor in your stack is shipping agents this year, and each one is very good inside its own walls. None of them is neutral about which walls you end up inside.
Salesforce AI knows Salesforce.
It is excellent inside the CRM, and it is built by a company whose interest is that the CRM becomes the centre of your marketing organisation.
Adobe AI knows Adobe.
The same, from the other side. Every suite agent is a very good argument for buying more of that suite.
GENESIS47 knows the company.
It has nothing to defend. It reads every system, works across all of them, and is indifferent about which of your vendors wins the next renewal.
Which is also why it is not trying to replace any of them. Your systems of record stay exactly where they are. What GENESIS47 takes over is the work that happens between them — the reconciling, the reporting, the moving of budget and briefs and approvals from one to the next.
The same is true a layer down. No single model is load-bearing — each job routes to whichever one does it best, and any of them can be swapped for open weights running on hardware you own.
Governance
The question isn't what it can do. It's what you can safely let it do.
Software with live credentials to your accounts is useful only if it can act, and safe only if it cannot act freely. Every action it can take has an owner, an authority boundary, an audit trail and a rollback path — set once, enforced every time, and legible to the people who have to sign off on it.
Every action has an owner
Not a service account. A named person who holds that authority in your organisation, and whose authority it is exercising when it acts.
Every action has a boundary
Spend ceilings, send limits, anything a customer or a regulator would see. It cannot work around the list, because the list is how it decides. Outside the line it stops and asks. Every time.
Every action has an audit trail
What it did, which figures it did it on, where those came from, when they were pulled, and who approved it. Exportable, and readable by someone who was not in the room.
Every action has a rollback path
Anything it changes, it can change back, and it knows the window in which that is still true. Nothing is proposed that cannot be undone or was not flagged as permanent when you approved it.
Start with one workflow. Prove it on your numbers.
Send us a paragraph about your company and we'll map it: every system you run, and where information and manual work actually move between them. Then we name the one workflow worth proving first. Free, and no sales deck.
Managed by us or licensed to your team · Priced on scope, never per seat